I'm ok going in any direction, I've had enough feedback to warrant a vote on the matter. League majority (13 votes) needed to change the rule.
Please share any thoughts below.
Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later
- SpartansGM
- Site Admin
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:20 am
Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later
Geoff M.
UBA Commissioner
San Francisco Spartans GM
UBA Commissioner
San Francisco Spartans GM
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:55 pm
- Contact:
Re: Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later
I went with option 3 though I personally prefer allowing picks to be traded, at least for the next draft , preferably 2
Re: Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later
Traded draft picks are a pain in the ass for commissioners so I definitely wouldn't support that. Especially 2 years. But all recent draftees should be able to trade. The reason for the rule in real life isn't applicable to the game
- SpartansGM
- Site Admin
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:20 am
Re: Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later
The rule of allowing PTBNL in a trade is removed and replaced with allowing recently drafted players to be traded.
Geoff M.
UBA Commissioner
San Francisco Spartans GM
UBA Commissioner
San Francisco Spartans GM