Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later

Locked

Should we continue to use PTBNL for trades?

No recently drafted players should be traded, and no Players to be Named Later should be allowed either.
4
18%
No recently drafted players should be traded, but Players to be Named Later should be allowed (CURRENT).
6
27%
Allow recently drafted players to be traded.
12
55%
 
Total votes: 22

User avatar
SpartansGM
Site Admin
Posts: 483
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:20 am

Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later

Post by SpartansGM » Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:41 am

I'm ok going in any direction, I've had enough feedback to warrant a vote on the matter. League majority (13 votes) needed to change the rule.

Please share any thoughts below.
Geoff M.
UBA Commissioner
San Francisco Spartans GM

ootpmark_SA
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later

Post by ootpmark_SA » Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:47 am

I went with option 3 though I personally prefer allowing picks to be traded, at least for the next draft , preferably 2

joe_pitt

Re: Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later

Post by joe_pitt » Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:59 pm

Traded draft picks are a pain in the ass for commissioners so I definitely wouldn't support that. Especially 2 years. But all recent draftees should be able to trade. The reason for the rule in real life isn't applicable to the game

User avatar
SpartansGM
Site Admin
Posts: 483
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 1:20 am

Re: Trading Rule Vote: Player to be Named Later

Post by SpartansGM » Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:11 am

The rule of allowing PTBNL in a trade is removed and replaced with allowing recently drafted players to be traded.
Geoff M.
UBA Commissioner
San Francisco Spartans GM

Locked